« Labour Humanists at Compass conference | Main | Results of Deputy Leadership Candidate Survey: Faith Based Welfare »

June 11, 2007

Results of Deputy Leadership Candidate Survey: House of Lords Reform and Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill

These are the responses from candidates for the Deputy Leadership of the Labour Party on a question about House of Lords reform and assisted dying for the terminally ill:

Do you agree that Parliament should vote for the removal of the right of Bishops to sit in the House of Lords in favour of a modernised chamber where all members are elected on merit and there is no religious discrimination or privilege?

Hilary Benn

A_hilary_benn_3 I am in favour of a 100% elected house of Lords.

 

Hazel Blears

A_hazel_blears_3 No, I think there should be more diverse faiths represented in the revised second chamber, and I do not support the disestablishment of the Church of England.



Jon Cruddas

A_cruddas003_3
I voted for a fully elected House of Lords.



Peter Hain

A_hainI am in favour of a fully elected second chamber in which all members have a democratic mandate from the voters.



Harriet Harman

A_harrietportraitI voted for a fully elected House of Lords, and have always voted for the most democratic formulation offered to Parliament. A 100% elected House of Lords removes unquestionable right from all positions in Parliament - religious or otherwise.

.

Alan Johnson

House of Lords reform is an important concern.  My starting point is that the primacy of the Commons A_johnsonmust be maintained and that the second chamber is for scrutinising and revision.  In the latest vote on the issue I backed the 80:20 option as the best way forward.  Some appointments can ensure particular expertise as well as gender and ethnic balance.  I do not think that removing the Bishops in the Lords are the key concern but if we move towards a more elected model then it would be more difficult for them to remain in their current numbers. 



In light of the fact that it is supported by over 80% of people in the UK, what is your view on changing the law to allow assisted dying for the terminally ill?

Hilary Benn

Although I can see there is a powerful case for allowing people to choose the time and manner of their death, I am not yet persuaded that sufficient safeguards can be put in place to prevent abuse of vulnerable people.

Hazel Blears

I think there needs to be an informed debate about assisted dying, based on medical and ethical concerns.

Jon Cruddas

Traditionally this is not a party political issue.  If legislation is proposed, then I will certainly consider it on its merits as an individual Member of Parliament.

Peter Hain

Parliament has always treated the issue of assisted dying as a matter of conscience for individual MPs, and it should remain so.

Harriet Harman

I support assisted dying for the terminally ill.

Alan Johnson

On assisted dying for the terminally ill, I’m sceptical but think this is a matter for every individuals’ conscience and would advocate a free vote if this issue was raised in the House of Commons.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451eb4e69e200df3521ceba8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Results of Deputy Leadership Candidate Survey: House of Lords Reform and Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill:

Comments

Thank goodness some candidates have the guts to differentiate between church and state in education and recognise the need for a fully elected second chamber.
I could almost rejin the Party I represented in the House until I decided to
leave after 15 years.

In my opinion Harriet Harmen & Peter Hain know what they are talking about here.Especially Peter Hain who due to his work in Northern Ireland is all too aware of the damage done to society by segregating children according to the religious beliefs of their parents.When will this insanity stop?!

Nice to see that the bible-bashers got a real bashing in the Deputy Leader election. Is there hope that Opus Dei can now be ejected from the Cabinet?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Join the Labour Humanists

Aims and Values

  • The Labour Humanist Group exists to spread awareness of humanism and humanists within the Labour Party and to promote humanist and Labour values. We are committed to:
  • - Fostering a commitment to equality and universal human rights, including the freedom of religion and belief for all people;
  • - Promoting a rational approach to bioethical, medical and scientific issues as the best guarantee of human progress;
  • - Defending and advancing secular government and an open society as the best model of a society where all can be included;
  • - Advocating an inclusive and accommodating education system which can meet the needs of children and parents of different religions and beliefs in a framework common to all, and opposing faith schools and academies;
  • - Defending the secular nature of our public services

What Do Humanists Believe?

About Labour

  • ‘The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. It believes that by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone, so as to create for each of us the means to realise our true potential and for all of us a community in which power, wealth and opportunity are in the hands of the many, not the few. Where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe. And where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect.’
Blog powered by TypePad

Are You a Humanist?